<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kielsky Rike PLLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://krazlaw.com/w/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://krazlaw.com/w</link>
	<description>Attorneys at Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>False Arrest</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2012/05/false-arrest/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2012/05/false-arrest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if an outdated, impractical law was being enforced to the letter, even though the law had been declared unconstitutional by the courts? This is a real problem with A.R.S § 28-1595 (C). A.R.S § 28-1595 (C) essentially requires that anyone, at any time, may be required to show identification to law enforcement upon request, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2012/05/false-arrest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Might See This, If We Ever Got Into Trouble &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/11/you-might-see-something-like-this-if-we-got-in-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/11/you-might-see-something-like-this-if-we-got-in-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/11/you-might-see-something-like-this-if-we-got-in-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>90 Day Residency Requirement for Divorce in Arizona</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/07/90-day-residency-requirement-for-divorce-in-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/07/90-day-residency-requirement-for-divorce-in-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 03:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the requirements that must be met for a court in Arizona to have subject matter jurisdiction in a dissolution of marriage (divorce) matter is &#8220;that one of the parties, at the time the action was commenced, was domiciled in this state, or was stationed in this state while a member of the armed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/07/90-day-residency-requirement-for-divorce-in-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denial of Photo Radar Defendant&#8217;s Confrontation and Due Process Rights</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/04/denial-of-photo-radar-defendants-confrontation-and-due-process-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/04/denial-of-photo-radar-defendants-confrontation-and-due-process-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 05:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Radar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right to confront witnesses by cross-examination is essential to due process. Forman v. Creighton School Dist. No. 14, 87 Ariz. 329, 333, 351 P.2d 165, 168 (1960); Harries v. United States, 350 F.2d 231 (9th Cir. 1965); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (1985). In traditional traffic violation cases, the statutes provided that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/04/denial-of-photo-radar-defendants-confrontation-and-due-process-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge says Due Process does not apply in Photo Radar cases</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/04/judge-says-due-process-does-not-apply-in-photo-radar-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/04/judge-says-due-process-does-not-apply-in-photo-radar-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Radar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a photo radar case, CT2009-511612, in the West McDowell Justice Court, Maricopa County, Arizona. This is from the video recorded by the court for the trial on December 16, 2009, starting at about 9:00 am. I&#8217;m the one on the left, the judge is facing the camera at the top, and the guy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/04/judge-says-due-process-does-not-apply-in-photo-radar-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting case about the modification of spousal maintenance</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/interesting-case-about-the-modification-of-spousal-maintenance/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/interesting-case-about-the-modification-of-spousal-maintenance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spousal Maintenance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is a link to a recent Appellate Court decision from Arizona. It discusses the factors that the court considers during the modification of spousal maintenance. In this situation, the parties executed a property settlement agreement separately from their decree of dissolution. As a result, a modification of spousal maintenance was treated as a contract [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/interesting-case-about-the-modification-of-spousal-maintenance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Law is Powerless to Help, Not Powerless to Punish</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/chief-wiggum-the-law-is-powerless/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/chief-wiggum-the-law-is-powerless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police Chief Wiggum tells Marge that she needs to be at least dying, though not dead, to get justice against Becky: MP3 .wav Police Chief Wiggum tells Marge that the law is powerless to help, but not powerless to punish: MP3 .wav]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/chief-wiggum-the-law-is-powerless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://krazlaw.com/w/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/wiggum-on-law-is-powerless-to-help-not-powerless-to-punish.wav" length="35058" type="audio/wav" />
<enclosure url="http://krazlaw.com/w/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/wiggum-on-help-from-police.wav" length="181058" type="audio/wav" />
<enclosure url="http://krazlaw.com/w/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/wiggum-on-help-from-police.mp3" length="110160" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://krazlaw.com/w/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/wiggum-on-law-is-powerless-to-help-not-powerless-to-punish.mp3" length="21744" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unbundled Services</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/unbundled-services/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/unbundled-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typically when you hire an attorney, you are paying them for a bundled service. Say for instance you hire an attorney to represent you during your divorce. Your attorney may represent you from the point you first file until you receive the final court order. This would be considered a bundled service because your attorney [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/unbundled-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mediation</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/mediation/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/mediation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mediation is a method of alternative dispute resolution, or ADR. ADR is a general name encompassing different ways of resolving conflict outside the courtroom. Mediation is the most common form of ADR used in the context of family law. Mediation is a process involving a neutral party, the mediator, and the parties to the case. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/mediation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney v. Document Preparer</title>
		<link>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/attorney-v-document-preparer/</link>
		<comments>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/attorney-v-document-preparer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krazlaw.com/w/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perceived cost of an attorney can make a document preparer seem like an attractive alternative, but there are some major differences between a document preparer and an attorney. A document preparer is not required to have any legal training, and the courts prohibit document preparers from giving legal advice. If a document preparer does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://krazlaw.com/w/2011/03/attorney-v-document-preparer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

